🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 763+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts

★★★★★ 4.9 out of 5 (763 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22​
$36.67
Sale
✓ gratis fulfillment on this item • Limited time offer

Lily of Beverly Hills VTG super high waist pleated printed shorts 6Waist: 13”Rise: 13.5”Inseam:7”

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

📋 Product Description

Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts

Lily of Beverly Hills VTG super high waist pleated printed shorts 6

Waist: 13”
Rise: 13.5”
Inseam:7”

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 342823

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price: $36.67 USD

Sale Price: $22 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 4083 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · San Francisco, CA
★★★★★
Outstanding quality
Reliable daily use Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts.
21 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · San Francisco, CA

★★★★☆
exceptionally happy
In daily use, the Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts feels solid so it’s acceptable.
20 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King
4 months ago · Charlotte, NC
★★★★★
Absolutely adore it
At first, the Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts is practical and I don’t regret it.
4 people found this helpful

LN
Lauren Nelson ✓ Verified Purchase
7 months ago · Fort Worth, TX
★★★★★
really pleased​
For the price, the Lily of Beverly Hills VTG pleated shorts does its job and it meets expectations. Nothing fancy.
47 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson ✓ Verified Purchase
2 months ago · Kansas City, MO
★★★★☆
Exactly what I needed
So far, it works fine and it works for me.
46 people found this helpful