🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 941+ reviews
Beauty βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Living Proof Advanced dry Shampoo

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (941 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20​
$33.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

All brand-new never used or opened! High end solid!

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Living Proof Advanced dry Shampoo

All fresh never used or opened! High end decent!

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 642709

Category: Beauty > Hair Care > Styling Products

Original Price:$33.33 USD

Sale Price: $20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8608 reviews
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
The Living Proof Advanced dry Shampoo arrived well packed.
20 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
exceptionally happy
In daily use, the Living Proof Advanced dry Shampoo feels solid and it meets expectations. Arrived on time.
38 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous value for money
the Living Proof Advanced dry Shampoo works well enough and it’s fine overall.
26 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†​
Five stars!
At first, it is effortless to use so it’s acceptable.
41 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Tampa, FL​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
ultimate decision
After several use, the Living Proof Advanced dry Shampoo works fine so it’s acceptable.
22 people found this helpful