๐Ÿšš at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.6/5 from 342+ reviews
Outdoor โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Walking Sticks

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.6 out of 5 (342 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$28
$46.67
Sale
โœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Extending walking sticks, could also be used for hiking. I bought them used and I have not used them.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt fulfillment

โ†ฉ๏ธ
uncomplicated Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Walking Sticks

Extending walking sticks, could also be used for hiking.

I bought them used and I have not used them.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 749783

Category: Outdoor > Garden Hand Tools & Equipment > Garden Hatchets

Original Price: $46.67 USD

Sale Price: $28 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.6
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 6391 reviews
AP
Adam Parker โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago ยท Sacramento, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
splendid quality
To be fair, the Walking Sticks works as described and it works for me.
28 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Honolulu, HI

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Totally worth it
After a few days, the Walking Sticks does its job and I donโ€™t regret it. Nothing fancy.
39 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
premium
Nice and functional Walking Sticks.
6 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago ยท recent York, NY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
magnificent product
Good experience buying Walking Sticks.
27 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Nashville, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Simply incredible
Personally, the Walking Sticks works well enough so itโ€™s acceptable.
41 people found this helpful