๐Ÿšš at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 261+ reviews
Vintage โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Vintage 925 MOP EARRINGS

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.1 out of 5 (261 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$60
$100
Sale
โœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Vintage 925 MOP Pierced post EARRING sold but not ear heavy

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
uncomplicated Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Vintage 925 MOP EARRINGS

Vintage 925 MOP Pierced post EARRING sold but not ear heavy

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 866780

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Cuff Links

Original Price:$100 USD

Sale Price: $60 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3631 reviews
AP
Adam Parker โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Virginia Beach, VA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A+ quality
Not the ultimate Iโ€™ve used, but the Vintage 925 MOP EARRINGS is okay.
48 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Nashville, TN

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
outstanding for my needs
Packaging was basic, but the Vintage 925 MOP EARRINGS is okay.
20 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Orlando, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
No complaints
Honestly, it is hassle-gratis to use so no complaints.
6 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Philadelphia, PA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†​
ultimate decision
In daily use, the Vintage 925 MOP EARRINGS feels okay and Iโ€™m satisfied.
24 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Pittsburgh, PA​
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fancy this Vintage 925 MOP EARRINGS!
I like how basic the Vintage 925 MOP EARRINGS is. effortless to use.
28 people found this helpful