🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 485+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (485 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13
$21.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

None

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment

↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings

None​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1004982

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price: $21.67 USD

Sale Price: $13 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1714 reviews
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Super happy
Happy with the performance of Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings.
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Houston, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless for my needs
The Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings looks plain, but functionally it’s fine.
33 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase 
1 day ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings!
Personally, the Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings does its job and it meets expectations.
45 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
cherish it!
So far, the Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings fits my needs so it’s acceptable.
40 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
For the price, the Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings is practical which is good enough. Nothing fancy.
38 people found this helpful