๐Ÿšš at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.6/5 from 192+ reviews
Women โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

HOLD ME TIGHT - Body

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.6 out of 5 (192 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$32.99
$54.98
Sale
โœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Neckline : BacklessSheer : truly sheerPattern : PlainDetails : Adjustable strapsArticle number : ANE81S01G-G11

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt shipment

โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-gratis Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

HOLD ME TIGHT - Body

Neckline : Backless
Sheer : extremely sheer
Pattern : Plain
Details : Adjustable straps
Article number : ANE81S01G-G11

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1626100

Category: Women > Clothing > Underwear

Original Price:$54.98 USD

Sale Price: $32.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.6
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9747 reviews
JW
Jennifer Wilson โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Milwaukee, WI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
certainly impressed
I prefer the HOLD ME TIGHT - Body so far.
1 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
ideal for my needs
Solid HOLD ME TIGHT - Body. Feels reliable.
38 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Detroit, MI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
adore it!
In daily use, the HOLD ME TIGHT - Body fits my needs so no complaints.
JW
Jennifer Wilson โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Oakland, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
finest decision
From my experience, the HOLD ME TIGHT - Body works well enough and it works for me.
8 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Boston, MA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding!
Not impeccable, but the HOLD ME TIGHT - Body is good enough for what I need.
4 people found this helpful