🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 931+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (931 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30​
$50
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Hearts 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 with Cubic Ziconia Rhodium Plated

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5

Hearts 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 with Cubic Ziconia Rhodium Plated

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1750450

Category: Vintage > Supplies > Chain

Original Price:$50 USD

Sale Price: $30 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7146 reviews
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
The 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 is cozy and light.
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
delightful product
Honestly, it works well enough and it’s fine overall. shipment was normal.
13 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· recent York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
So far, the 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 works fine and it works for me. Packaging was basic.
25 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!​
At first, the 925 Sterling Silver Ring Size 5 feels solid which feels reasonable. Arrived on time.
9 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
finest decision
After a few use, it is effortless to use which is good enough.
1 people found this helpful