🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 559+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Uniden Cordless caller ID telephone

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5 (559 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$35
$58.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

not once used only opened the box

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
fast Shipping

↩️
accessible Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Uniden Cordless caller ID telephone

not ever used only opened the box​

This product is magnificent for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1797675

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Telephones

Original Price:$58.33 USD

Sale Price: $35 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 transport & Returns

βœ“ complimentary delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3591 reviews
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply incredible
At first, the Uniden Cordless caller ID telephone feels solid and I don’t regret it.
26 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific product
Solid purchase Uniden Cordless caller ID telephone.
9 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
cherish it!
For the price, it works fine which feels reasonable.
21 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
Honestly, the Uniden Cordless caller ID telephone works well enough which is good enough. Packaging was basic.
27 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
superb value for money
Honestly, the Uniden Cordless caller ID telephone performs as expected and it meets expectations. Works fine so far.
6 people found this helpful