🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 664+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Hue high rise jeggings

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (664 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13
$21.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Hue high rise jeggings Good condition No flaws or stains

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Hue high rise jeggings

Hue high rise jeggings
Good condition
No flaws or stains

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1850926

Category: Women > Jeans > Leggings & Jeggings

Original Price:$21.67 USD

Sale Price: $13 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6756 reviews
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid purchase
For the price, the Hue high rise jeggings feels okay so no complaints. No setup issues.
50 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable quality
For the price, the Hue high rise jeggings does its job and I don’t regret it.
19 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· San Francisco, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ultimate decision
From my experience, the Hue high rise jeggings performs as expected which is good enough.
8 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
fabulous find!
Honestly, the Hue high rise jeggings feels okay so no complaints.
41 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Chicago, IL​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So glad I bought this
The Hue high rise jeggings looks basic, but functionally it’s fine.
17 people found this helpful