🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 363+ reviews
Toys βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

MLB 2006 Topps Jim Thome Chicago White Sox #262

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (363 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$10.23
$17.05
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

No product description available.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

MLB 2006 Topps Jim Thome Chicago White Sox #262

No product description available.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2001392

Category: Toys > Sports Trading Cards > Baseball Trading Cards

Original Price:$17.05 USD

Sale Price: $10.23 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8457 reviews
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid purchase
The MLB 2006 Topps Jim Thome Chicago White Sox #262 arrived without damage.
43 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
the MLB 2006 Topps Jim Thome Chicago White Sox #262 fits my needs which feels reasonable.
47 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis​
3 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
adore this MLB 2006 Topps Jim Thome Chicago White Sox #262!
The MLB 2006 Topps Jim Thome Chicago White Sox #262 is exactly as advertised.
9 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
After a few days, it works well enough so it’s acceptable.
9 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply incredible
At first, it is practical so it’s acceptable.
37 people found this helpful