🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 769+ reviews
Toys βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5 (769 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$1.63​
$2.72
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394

1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2174021

Category: Toys > Sports Trading Cards > Hockey Trading Cards

Original Price:$2.72 USD

Sale Price: $1.63 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1995 reviews
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
foremost purchase ever
Personally, the 1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394 works as described and it meets expectations. shipping was normal.
42 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
At first, it works as described and I don’t regret it. Works fine so far.
19 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase​
10 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
terrific value for money
Honestly, the 1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394 performs as expected and it’s fine overall. Arrived on time.
36 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 days ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous value for money
Not impressed, not disappointed. The 1991 Topps Claude Lemieux 394 is okay.
3 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
Quality is not bad.
24 people found this helpful