🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 154+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Jockey Men's retro

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (154 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30.42
$50.7
Sale
βœ“ gratis delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Fabric type: 100% CottonCare instructions: Machine Wash8437316Bottom

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Jockey Men's iconic

  • Fabric type: 100% Cotton
  • Care instructions: Machine Wash
  • 8437316
  • Bottom

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2477662

Category: Men > CLOTHING > Underwear

Original Price: $50.7 USD

Sale Price: $30.42 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1201 reviews
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
exceptional choice
Personally, the Jockey Men's traditional is effortless to use and it’s fine overall. Packaging was simple.
9 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Denver, CO

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous investment
The Jockey Men's vintage arrived quickly and works superb.
29 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
To be fair, it feels okay which is good enough.
21 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…​
flawless purchase
It’s an okay product overall, the Jockey Men's enduring.
26 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Chicago, IL​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely faultless
To be fair, the Jockey Men's vintage works as described and it’s fine overall. Works fine so far.
33 people found this helpful